Saving historic pavement

Screen Shot 2017-03-13 at 1.19.25 PM.png

Sidewalk on Benefit Street, in Providence. (photo by Robin Williams during 2016 visit)

One of many fascinating narratives in Seven Ages of Paris was author Alistair Horne’s frequent return to the subject of how Paris’s streets evolved from muddy lanes awash in human waste to paved streets with gutters down the middle to guide sewage toward the nearest river. Eventually, sewers were put underground and streets were covered with increasingly elegant pavements. American streets evolved likewise, then saw a devolution in which variously characteristic paving techniques of the 19th century were ripped up or covered over with asphalt in the 20th century.

Screen Shot 2017-03-15 at 12.08.02 PM.png

In Marais district of Paris. (Pinterest)

Asphalt offered a smoother ride or stroll, but it replaced stone and brick pavements on roads and sidewalks that spiced up the personality of the streetscape. Now there is pushback from Robin B. Williams, chairman of the department of architectural history at the Savannah College of Art and Design, who is working to preserve remaining historic pavements.

Williams, who has a doctor- ate in art history from the University of Pennsylvania, recently described his crusade in “Neglected Heritage Beneath Our Feet,” published on the website of The Cultural Landscape Foundation. Subtitled “Documenting Historic Street and Sidewalk Pavement Across America,” his essay begins:

While historic buildings have enjoyed the attention of preservation professionals for decades, the landscapes that are part of their physical setting have largely gone unprotected and undesignated, and are vulnerable to the whims of less sensitive decision makers. … It is concern for the fate of Savannah’s remarkable pavements that resulted into an ongoing national study and the launch of a dedicated new website, entitled Historic Pavement.

He adds:

Prior to the development of inexpensive modern asphalt in the 1920s, cities struggled to find affordable, durable, and available types of pavement suitable to their needs. Pavement was inherently local, with each city devising its own solution to the challenge of paving streets – resulting in unique regional paving “fingerprints.” The varying degrees to which historic pavements survive in cities further enhances this sense of identity.

DSCN0250.JPG

Robin Williams (Brussat photo)

I recently joined Williams on a tour of Charleston with Nathaniel Walker, of the College of Charleston, who had invited us to sit on a panel discussing trends in historic preservation. When we happened upon a pavement of cobblestones or other material, Williams would reveal his method of documentation by leaning over to place a ruler on the ground and then photographing it to record the dimensions of the paving materials. He performed this ritual dozens of times.

I learned that he had visited Providence when I noticed that the photograph atop his essay – which I’ve chosen to put on top of this post – was of the sidewalk of slate flanked by herringbone brick running alongside the brownstone wall of the John Brown House (1786), and that of the Nightingale Brown House (1791), both on a two-block stretch of Benefit Street, near where I lived in three apartments on Providence’s Mile of History during my first 14 years here. (Those are the pretty legs of his wife and daughter walking down the pavement ahead of him in the photo.)

So Williams is probably aware of and may even have documented Friends Lane, on College Hill, the restoration of which received a preservation award from the Providence Preservation Society in 1999 and the R.I. Historical Pre- servation & Heritage Commission in 2000 – for obvious reasons their awards programs often overlap. The two awards recognize that places are venerable to the extent that their entire physicality, not just their architecture, contri- butes to beauty that translates into lovability. Williams may be the world’s greatest custodian of that part of a holistic truth that is hidden in plain sight, right beneath our feet.

Screen Shot 2017-03-15 at 11.51.05 AM.png

Neighbors Lane, on College Hill. (photo by Richard Benjamin, http://www.richardbenjamin.com)

Posted in Architecture, Art and design, Preservation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Christopher Gray, RIP

Screen Shot 2017-03-14 at 11.17.52 AM.png

Christopher Gray smiles near acanthus-bedecked building in New York. (NYT)

Just got a sad email from Irving Sheldon, my friend and former colleague at the Providence Journal, that Christopher Gray has just died. From 1987 to 2014, he wrote the weekly “Streetscapes” column in the real-estate section on Sundays for the New York Times.

Gray’s column was not strictly architecture criticism, for he wrote not to praise or damn particular buildings or styles, as I do. No, he wrote lovingly detailed the histories of buildings, great and small, mostly in Manhattan, and part of his genius was to wrap into those histories the  endearing (or vexing) tales of their owners, occupants, architects, builders and other associated human beings. In short, he brought architecture to life. Gray also ran a business, the Office for Metropolitan History, which he founded in 1975 to help clients research the history of buildings in which they were interested, and whose existence his widow apparently intends to perpetuate.

Shel knew Gray from school, and introduced me to his writing long ago. His work did not convey stylistic preferences other than passively, at least most of the time. Through the buildings he chose to write about you could get a feel for his preferences. Or maybe I am just “projecting” my own preferences into the mind of someone I admired so much.

Here is David Dunlap’s obituary of Gray in the Times: “Christopher Gray, Architecture Writer and Researcher, Dies at 66.” Here is his last column, “Down the Block, Deep in the Stacks,” on Dec. 26, 2014.

Gray retired from the New York Times at about the same time I was released from the Journal after its sale. I wrote Gray and then called him. I was throwing hail-Mary job applications, and had tossed one of these to the Times, but Gray told me with considerable regret that the paper was not hiring but laying off scores and scores of writers and editors, and that my chances there were nil. Of course, I already knew they were nil because my take on architecture was non grata at the Times. Sure, Gray himself seemed to be evidence to the contrary. Maybe this was why I thought maybe I had a sliver of a chance to latch on somehow.

So I may personally thank Christopher Gray for allowing me to build happy (if temporary) castles in the dreamy sandbox of my own mind. He has ennobled his world. May he rest in peace.

Screen Shot 2017-03-14 at 2.23.37 PM.png

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Eulogies for Fogarty on tap

Screen Shot 2017-03-13 at 7.42.29 PM.png

Fogarty Building in downtown Providence. (exploringvenustas.wordpress.com)

Whether you are glad or sad to see it go, the Fogarty Building finally seems about to ruthlessly collide its chunky members, such as they are, for the last time. Demolition of the empty, forlorn 1967 building in the Brutalist style is set to begin soon, at 111 Fountain St., though one snowfall has already delayed it and another on the way just might. Some in Providence are preparing to bid the Fogarty a fond adieu.

Marisa Angell Brown, assistant director of programs at the John Nicholas Brown Center for Public Humanities and Cultural Heritage, and Caroline Stevens of Doors Open RI , along with Marena Wisniewski at the Providence Preservation Society, and others, are organizing a “wake” for the poor old sod. They have been tracking down people to give brief eulogies at the free but somber event to be held Friday, March 17, St. Patrick’s Day, at 4 p.m. near the Fogarty. Brown has asked me to fashion a eulogy that chills the proverbial skunk in the funeral parlor, and I have agreed.

That should not be so difficult. Fogarty was a modest fellow, notwithstanding its Brutalism. Instead of ruthlessly colliding its chunky members (that’s from the Penguin Dictionary of Architecture), its concrete squats between Fountain and Sabin with considerable civility, its rectangular windows laid out with military precision, its massing fairly identical to that of its neighbor, the Providence Journal Building, where I worked for 30 years without giving the old boy more than the occasional nod. Not my cup of tea? Of course not. But Brutalist? Not quite.  Not really. Too inoffensive. Didn’t quite muster the brusque jackanapes that its name suggests and that characterize of many of its brethren.

So we will mourn in the true spirit of St. Patrick, who was certainly not the Fogarty’s patron saint but who may be relied upon to shed a happy tear.

For more information, email Marisa Brown at marisa_brown@brown.edu or Caroline Stevens at mailto:caroline@doorsopenri.org.

Posted in Architecture, Providence | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Plan to goof up Prov library

Screen Shot 2017-03-12 at 10.58.56 AM.png

Rendering of five LED panels proposed for 1954 addition to Providence Public Library. (PPL)

The 1954 Moderne addition to the Providence Public Library’s original Beaux-Arts building, completed in 1900, already has much to atone for. Not the building itself – its architects and, more, the PPL board that canceled a classical addition (below) in favor of the above. Not only did the addition’s insensitivity disrupt a lovely intersection at Washington and Empire – soon to be eroded by urban renewal – it also literally stretched itself out so as to block views of the far superior original building from the east.

Since then, successive wasteful renovations have shifted the building’s entrance from Washington Street to Empire Street, back to Washington Street and back again to Empire Street. (The final shift had the look of corruption.) The public deserves to enjoy the original building’s entrance, beautiful both inside and out; the 1954 addition’s appearance is itself the best argument for shifting the entrance back to the original. The peripatetic entrance largely reflects the waxing, waning, waxing and waning status of architectural beauty within the library’s governing body.

Now, according to “Proposed Providence library signage running into questions” in the Providence Business News, the board has decided that forcing the public to enter through the uglier façade (into, by the way, a setting that resembles that of a municipal tax office) is not enough. It has decided to goof up that already lame façade with a set of gaudy, colorful LED advertisements for itself (above). The signage and its mechanical installation will only further undermine the dignity of the addition’s appearance, night and day alike. As for the original, its sadness will only become more painful.

Fortunately, Ted Sanderson, longtime director of the Rhode Island Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission, is skeptical of the merits of the proposal. Since the agency is charged with overseeing its renovation grant of $150,000, it must approve the proposal.

Approval would set a precedent that might lead other historic building owners to erode Providence’s beauty in new ways intended to defeat the excellent efforts of the city and preservationists over the decades to thwart the tendency of our era’s design elites to truckle to fashion rather than to obey the law that protects the city’s (far more valuable) historical character. Let us hope that the RIHPHC stands firm.

libraryadd copy.JPG

Unbuilt 1920s-era addition sits to right of original library building. (PPL)

Posted in Architecture, Preservation, Providence | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Oops! Wrong shot of hotel

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 2.58.40 PM.png

Latest design for proposed Procaccianti Group hotel. (TPG)

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 3.26.21 PM.png

The Fogarty Building. (Journal)

Thursday’s Providence Journal story, “Icon? Eyesore? Demolition to begin of Fogar- ty Building in downtown,” about the demise of the Fogarty Building and its replacement by a new hotel had the wrong picture of the hotel design. It shows the original design, not the latest design – which is to begin construction soon. As a public service, Architecture Here and There offers the correct photo atop this post. The rendering shows the hotel’s Sabin Street façade. The original design, below, from 2014, printed accidentally, shows the hotel’s Fountain Street façade. Notice the total (and admirable) flip-flop from a building that belongs on Jefferson Boulevard to one that at least strives to fit into its downtown setting.

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 2.59.21 PM.png

Initial design for Procaccianti Group hotel. (TPG)

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Swallow up R.I., circa 1862

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 1.12.44 PM.png

Map of colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, circa 1778. (boundless.com)

The British writer Anthony Trollope, born in 1815, wrote over forty novels plus various nonfictional accounts, including a two-volume North America, published in 1862 and based on a nine months’ sojourn here. In 1823, his mother, Frances Trollope, wrote a controversial but popular dishing of the United States called Domestic Manners of the Americans. Her son’s own book, whatever its merits, features this curious passage on Rhode Island:

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 1.35.51 PM.png

Anthony Trollope

Rhode Island, as the State is usually called, is the smallest State in the Union. I may perhaps best show its disparity to other States by saying that New York extends about 250 miles from north to south and the same distance from east to west; whereas the State called Rhode Island is about forty miles long by twenty broad, independently of certain small islands. It would, in fact, not form a considerable addition, if added on to many of the other States. Nevertheless, it has all the same powers of self-government as are possessed by such nationalities as the States of New York and Pennsylvania; and sends two senators to the Senate at Washington, as do those enormous States. Small as the State is, Rhode Island itself forms but a small portion [of its name]. The authorized and proper name of the State is Providence Plantation and Rhode Island [sic]. Roger Williams was the first founder of the colony, and he established himself on the mainland at a spot which he called Providence. Here now stands the city of Providence, the chief town of the State; and a thriving, comfortable town it seems to be, full of banks, fed by railways and steamers, and going ahead quite as quickly as Roger Williams could in his fondest hopes have desired.

Rhode Island, as I have said, has all the attributes of government in common with her stouter and more famous sisters. She has a governor, and an upper house, and a lower house of legislature; and she is somewhat fantastic in the use of these constitutional powers, for she calls on them to sit now in one town and now in another. Providence is the capital of the State; but the Rhode Island parliament sits sometimes at Providence and sometimes at Newport. At stated times also it has to collect itself at Bristol, and at other stated times at Kingston, and at others at East Greenwich. Of all legislative assemblies it is the most peripatetic. Universal suffrage does not absolutely prevail in this State, a certain property qualification being necessary to confer a right to vote even for the State Representatives. I should think it would be well for all parties if the whole State could be swallowed up by Massa- chusetts or by Connecticut, either of which lie convenient for the feat; but I presume that any suggestion of such a nature would be regarded as treason by the men of Providence Plantation.

I trust that my former editor Bob Whitcomb will enjoy this. Submerging Rhode Island in either of its two neighbors was an intermittent proposal of his, often in the councils of the editorial board of the Providence Journal, and occasionally even in his published  editorials and opeds. To my recol- lection he was never chastized for his treasonable apostasy by voices either on the inside or the outside of 75 Fountain St.

In colonial times, however, the colony was indeed targeted for elimination by a combination of Connecticut, Plymouth, New Haven and Massachusetts Bay called the United Colonies of New England. No action was ever taken. (The colony and state have been named Rhode Island and Providence Plantations since 1644.)

Posted in Books and Culture, Rhode Island | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

TB: Ode to a Tuscan column

Screen Shot 2017-03-10 at 11.49.48 AM.png

 Tuscan entablature envisioned as ceiling molding. (proremodeler.com)

Here is February’s post for my blog at Traditional Building, titled “Ode to a Tuscan column.” It chews on some erudite – some might say persnickety – conversation about how to transform the entablature of a Tuscan column into the molding for a traditional ceiling. But if such small differences about detail determine the work’s success or failure, what about that space between error and experimentation in carrying out the classical canon? It all adds up to a rumination on whether “bad trad” is really the worst enemy of the classical revival. Read it!

Posted in Architecture, Art and design | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Arthur Ross Awards, 2017

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 11.19.57 AM.png

“A Classical Perspective” (2012), by Carl Laubin, capriccio in oil. (carllaubin.com)

Back in 2013 I visited Chicago to attend the celebration of that year’s Driehaus Prize laureate, Thomas Beeby. Amid the festivities was a large landscape in oil that included work by all of the first ten Driehaus recipients, commissioned by Richard Driehaus and executed by the British painter Carl Laubin. My joy in closely perusing it – I returned again and again – stirred a desire to post a blog on his work. I never managed to execute it, and have been nagged ever since by twinges of guilt. So I am very, very pleased to see that this year’s winner of the equally prestigious Arthur Ross award in the category of fine art is Laubin himself. (A description of the stages in his effort to produce the above painting is featured on Laubin’s website.)

The Arthur Ross Awards for Excellence in the Classical Tradition are given for the winners’ life’s work. The awards program is sponsored by the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, and this year there are eight laureates, with architect Peter Pennoyer winning for his firm’s work. Last month I wrote in my Traditional Building blog about Thomas Gordon Smith, of Notre Dame; he wins a Ross this year in the category of education.

The other winners are: John Saladino, for interior design; Kevin Lippert and the Princeton Architectural Press, for publishing; Stephen Byrns, for stewardship; John H. Bryan, for patronage; and Norman Davenport Askins, who received the annual special award selected by the board. The other laureates were selected by a jury composed of Andrew Skurman (chair, who sat next to me on the Ross jury of 2011), Stanley Dixon, Philip Liederbach, Barbara Sallick and John Sebastian.

Here is the ICAA description of the winners, with photos of their work.

These Ross awardees have spent their careers manifesting the ICAA mission, which is dedicated to “advancing the practice and appreciation of the classical tradition in architecture and the allied arts. ICAA fulfills its mission through four program areas: education, publications, awards, and advocacy.” Classical architecture and art in the traditional vein are natural allies. Great architecture without the inclusion of sculpture, painting and other fine arts is almost inconceivable. Split them and you end up with sterile buildings whose art – the “turd in the plaza” school – has been segregated from the architecture, deported from the building itself to the vapid plazas that garner zoning height credits for blighted developers around the world. But don’t get me going. The ICAA wants to help the nation and the world move past that.

I am spotlighting Pennoyer’s apartment building at 151 E78th St., in New York City, below only because it is so delightful an example of his work.

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 10.44.45 AM.png

Above (r.) and below: 151 E78th St., by Peter Pennoyer. (Peter Pennoyer Architects)

Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 10.44.07 AM.png

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A lovely 3 minutes in Rome

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.37.38 PM.png

Do the pigeons like Rome? (all screenshots from Big Geek Daddy)

Here is a video of Rome, with some clips from Pisa and Vatican City, sent to me by Big Geek Daddy. Actually, they sent a video of Barcelona, but it was marred by too much focus on special effects, though not as badly as some I’ve seen. This mostly Rome video uses such techniques far more sparingly, mostly slo-mo or stop-action, and the result allows you to drink in some of the world’s most beautiful civic scenery. The videographer lingers on beauty. Many of the slow motion shots feature pigeons on the wing passing classical statuary and monumental façades to die for. Do the pigeons notice any of this? Do their hearts get any lift at all?

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.53.55 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.10.38 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.46.19 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.43.43 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.44.16 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.09.46 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.12.33 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.45.23 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.43.02 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.46.58 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.55.36 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.10.59 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.11.52 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.54.39 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 12.44.46 PM.png

Posted in Architecture, Art and design, Video | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Good ideas for 6/10, I-195

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 2.28.47 PM.png

Finely drawn overview of ND urbanism studio’s program for the I-195 corridor.

Perhaps this comes too late to affect either the Route 195 corridor project (now renamed the Innovation & Design District) or the plan to rebuild the Route 6/10 connector. The former has been advanced (if you can call it that) using architecture that seems expressly designed to diminish public interest in the district’s success. Planning stages for the latter had entertained the possibility of the highway being replaced by a boulevard, but safety concerns supposedly forced the state to rush into a rebuild-as-is strategy for replacing the old connector, crumbling into decrepitude as you read this.

Too bad. Still, good advice is never to be spurned, so here are some recommendations generated last fall from a studio held here in Providence by Notre Dame professor Philip Bess and five of his graduate students at ND’s School of Architecture. Their ideas, under the title “Building Durable Wealth,” have now been released to the public. Below are passages from the report and more illustrations.

Building Durable Wealth addresses two similar-but-different sites in Providence, R.I. The 195 Redevelopment District is the site of a former urban freeway. The 6/10 Connector is the site of an existing urban freeway. This academic project by five architecture students is a counter-proposal to what is currently being proposed for each, undertaken in service to long-term durable urban recovery in Providence.

Regarding issues of architecture and planning it states:

[T]he adaptation and renewed construction of historic local buildings and building types (especially the urban apartment building, the loft building, and the occasional mill building – for which students did individual designs), on urban blocks sub-divid- ed into smaller lots, is central to our entire proposal; and this not least for their long-term environmental performance and sustainability.

The report describes the 195 project’s genesis in the relocation of the portion of highway running through the Jewelry District and the creation of a commission, in 2011, to oversee its development by reknitting the streets severed by the old road and inviting companies and institutions to buy and build on very large development parcels. It reads:

The I-195 Commission has specifically targeted institutions engaged in medical and scientific R&D, and also developers of mid-rise urban housing; but the former especially come with institutional programs almost invariably resulting in block-sized buildings characterized by large floor plates, ‘gizmo-green’ technology, flat roofs, lots of glass, and packed with offices, laboratories, and long corridors.

It would seem self-evidently pointless – and against the language of the 2011 law – to restitch the old street pattern while ignoring the old design pattern. Yet that is what is being done. The report continues, contrasting the very successful natural patterns of development during the 19th and early 20th centuries with the patterns now being promoted, which supposedly epitomize the way cities are built in the 21st century:

Providence has many urban assets, including excellent streets defined by handsome, durable and altogether exemplary background buildings – a city built incrementally, by local builders, with local money. By comparison, given the multiple parcels being offered for development, the City’s current fiscal condition, the general uncertainties of the global economy, and the dubious durability and lovability of the architecture and urbanism that crony-capitalist financing typically produce, Providence’s current approach to 195 District development seems a high-risk / dubious-reward venture.

Our incremental urbanist counter-proposal would have Providence promote the manner of building-and-finance that created those parts of historic Providence that everyone most loves, by further subdividing the new 195 blocks into smaller lots and encouraging updated versions of known and durable ‘background building’ types culturally continuous with the best building traditions of Providence and adapted to modern institutional programs.

As for the 6/10 connector, Professor Bess and his students discovered that there was no intact urban fabric in existence that was ripped apart by the highway like the Jewelry District and downtown were severed by Route 195. Nor, they found, was the terrain amenable to a relatively straight boulevard. So instead of proposing a version of the boulevard proposed previously in lieu of rebuilding the old highway, or worse (as originally proposed by the state), they proposed a parkway, which typically winds through a more variable topography and is even more landscaped than a boulevard.

Our own study of historic maps of Providence indicates there never was a pre-existing urban fabric the 6/10 Connector rent asunder, and that an urban boulevard stitching several neighborhoods together at grade is not really possible owing to topographical constraints, the varying widths of the 6/10 ROW (165’ – 400’), and a long antecedent and immediately adjacent [Amtrak/MBTA] rail line to the west. Nevertheless, the 6/10 Connector provides irregu- lar opportunities for development. Given the impossibility of a boulevard, we think a 35-mph-design-speed parkway with better street & bridge connections across the 6/10, as well as strategic recreational and mixed-use interventions where the 6/10 ROW- width allows, is both possible and a better long-term solution than a simple (but costly) rebuild of the 6/10’s existing freeway infrastructure.

And as some of the illustrations below attest, Bess and his students were able to figure out how this could be done in a pleasant, satisfying vernacular style.

My guess is that this parkway, like the boulevard supported by several local community and urbanist groups, and initially supported by the city, would turn out to be far less expensive and time-consuming than rebuilding the nine bridges of which the current connector consists. That would make it the safest option. And it would be a relief to people long inured to the problems of a limited-access highway cutting through city neighborhoods. But the state has decided not to offer that. The reason probably has less to do with safety, and rather more to do with something much more prosaic, say, maintaining the flow of federal dollars to RIDOT.

As we in Rhode Island know all too well, roads, bridges and other infra- structure end up costing a surprising amount of money when they are not properly maintained. And unless they are loved by the public, the public is unlikely to care to bear the cost of their upkeep, and unlikely to put enough pressure on state government to bear that cost, which will be kicked down the road until safety finally does force the issue.

Yet, as is well known at Notre Dame but at very few other universities with architecture and planning programs, there are ways to satisfy the needs of populations and their desire for beauty that cost far less than the typical deferred-maintenance policy.

Why don’t these types of program make sense automatically to everyone involved in the fields of architecture, planning and development? It’s as if the entire world, or at least the entire set of related building professions, has had a massive brain fart lasting decades and, instead of simply ducking away from its odor and breathing in clean, healthy, efficient and beautiful air – instead of moving forward into the future on sweet tried-and-true fumes – it has kept its foot pressed hard on the accelerator as the garage fills with a poison that it fully recognizes as such, with the world seemingly helpless to stop it.

Go figure.

Here are several illustrations taken from the study. Below these illustrations is a list of what the students learned through their investigation of the two projects, with all their urbanistic differences and similarities.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 6.58.46 PM.png

The 6/10 connector project to the west (left), the I-195 project to the east.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 7.00.55 PM.png

Screenshot of report showing 195 guidelines and proposal (l., c.) and 6/10 connector.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 2.27.19 PM.png

Student sketches of building types for I-195 project.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 7.16.08 PM.png

Map showing three proposals for I-195 project.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 2.30.41 PM.png

First set of maps and sketches detailing proposals for 6/10 connector project.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 7.16.54 PM.png

Second set of maps and sketches detailing proposals for 6/10 connector project.

Among the lessons learned were these:

1. The merits of full blocks subdivided into half-block-depth lots with 20-30 foot street frontage. These include:

a. a finer grain of ownership for more varied urban activities and street life

b. lower barriers to development entry, which encourage local investment, require fewer publicly-supplied financial incentives, steadily add properties to the city’s tax rolls, make possible better architecture, minimize the consequences of bad buildings (big and small), and create a more active and vibrant cityscape.

c. the ability to purchase multiple lots when necessary to have a large footprint building, but retain the small footprint building as the default condition.

2. Importance of background buildings: a.) as shapers of streets and squares, b.) as durable and adaptable buildings, c.) as aspirationally handsome in their own right, but properly deferential to grander works of civic and religious architecture.

3. Linking proposed plazas and squares to local public bus routes.

4. The adaptability and environmental sustainability of durable construction and lovable urban building types. (Ironically, one of the paradigmatic, iconic, durable, handsome loft-type background buildings we “discovered” in Providence turned out to be the RISD School of Architecture.)

5. The topographical logic of urban form generally, and industrial city development in particular. There are reasons the 6/10 Connec- tor is where it is, between a hill and an existing rail line, which itself is where it is because of the hill and the adjacent creek / tributary that drains it. This required students to think about the 6/10 ROW reclamation not abstractly, but rather mindful of the peculiarities of the varying site conditions encountered along its length.

6. Awareness of the role of land banking and speculation in boom-and-bust real estate cycles and the increasing unafford- ability of market-supplied urban housing. This suggests to us a need for greater urbanist attention to strategies of implemen- tation for a Land Value Tax at appropriate jurisdictional scale.

By the way, Philip Bess and his students can hardly imagine the degree of irony involved in the discovery described in the fourth lesson learned!

I cannot resist suggesting that although the barn door may be closed for both of these well-studied districts, cooler heads could prevail and end up offering warmer versions of each. There is time. Stranger things have happened.

 

Posted in Architecture, Providence, Urbanism and planning | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments