I was saddened to hear of the passage on Monday, after a year-long illness, of Mary Campbell Gallagher, a leader in the fight against skyscrapers and other modernist architecture in Paris. Mary was best known for her work as liaison in the United States for SOS Paris, an organization dedicated to preserving the historical character of the City of Light. She founded and led the Save Paris International coalition, dedicated to the same exalted purpose.
Expressions of deep regret are rolling in from the community that supports Mary’s initiatives in Paris, including Lucy Minogue Rowland, who writes: “What a loss to urbanism and especially to Paris, which she loved so much.” Nir Buras, author of Classical Planning, writes that “[h]er spirit continues to inspire us and her deeds remind us of our own commitments to beauty.” Her close friend the architectural curator Seth Joseph Weine observed, truly, that “[w]ith her … combination of grace, energy and intelligence, she unflinchingly identified and targeted the enemies of what makes cities wonderful places.” Her obituary notes that her friends considered her to be “both beautiful and powerful, a woman of vision, strong [and] articulate.” In addition to leading in the trenches of the style wars in Paris, Mary lectured widely on that city, on skyscrapers and on architecture. She had a degree in law from Harvard, which enabled her to comment acutely on the legal battles fought to save the beauty of Paris.
My own contact with Mary goes back at least to 2008, when she sent me a copy of a white paper written by architectural theorist Michael Mehaffy about then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy’s “Grand Paris 2030” plan. The result of this early use of my pipeline, via Mary, to the resistance in Paris to modernism was my Providence Journal column “France must heed cry of SOS Paris” [alas, the link doesn’t work], which sums up the continuing fight since then – mostly lost causes thus far. Mary has populated my writing frequently.
Still awaiting publication is a book of essays edited by Mary (including one by me) about how Paris and France must defeat the forces of ugliness pounding on the gates of beauty. In English, it will be called Paris Without Skyscrapers, or, in French, Paris Sans Gratte-Ciels (a much more evocative title that calls to mind what the word skyscraper actually means: scraper of the sky).
Mary’s latest contribution to my blog was her guest post in April, reprinted from Le Figaro. It is called “Lovers of Paris the World Over Are Alarmed as it Descends into Ugliness.” In my introduction to her essay, I told of having emailed her my theory that the attack on Paris’s beauty was inspired by a “growing desire to trash Western culture,” which she described as “looney tunes.” In reply, my apology of sorts was: “I admit I phrased this idea a bit more bluntly than was advisable.”
My point is to note that her legal training and her experience as a journalist and publicist resulted in considerable frankness in our years of emails back and forth regarding journalistic practice, often criticizing my occasional failure to list all her allies in the Parisian fights, and occasionally the structure of my quotations of her in my columns and posts, and various other disputes too recondite to summarize here. Others surely benefited from this side of her character. She was very sharp, very tart, and while we certainly did agree on almost every matter regarding Paris and architecture, she held me to the highest standards in my writing.
I’m sure she’s looking down now, and wishing she could type out a riposte involving my quotations of praise from her friends and colleagues, above, which required some slight editing to fit, to parse well, and, once, to censor (or rather to omit) a remark that might have caused confusion. And maybe some other things.
So I am sad that Mary and I will no longer engage in our battles over writing. Nor will she stand by me and I by her in battles over the city we love. But she will be there in spirit! She has been taken up to that great Haussmannesque city in the sky, where she will stroll the boulevards with nary a skyscraper in sight, since the Paris of the future will surely reflect her own exalted vision.
.. Mary appears to be quite the Lady .. her tremendous efforts and activism seem legendary .. May the Good LORD rest her Soul … and celebrate such a legacy …. GOD Bless! ‘peace’
“which she described as “looney tunes.” In reply, my apology of sorts was “I admit I phrased this idea a bit more bluntly than was advisable.”
Not blunt at all. Meekness, and a sort of euphemistic politeness (where nothing is really said) is a tendency of mediocres, and It spreads spreads like wildfire in a democracy (read:mediocrity) among certain classes… Since the opposition is brutal you need to use all resources, maintaining some style though. Envy of all what is superior and what sticks its head above the ruling mediocrity is the psychological basis of democracy, and it gives all people long toes.
A better style of arguing cannot be established during a democracy, Bluntness is needed at times, or the brutal opposition will overpower you, and take you justifiably for a meek sheep.
I take your point, John, but for the purposes of an obituary I decided, as part of a narrative offering a peek at Mary’s ways, to fall on my sword and picture myself as apologetic in that instance. I’m sure you understand. And I’m not sure I’m totally in sync with your opinion of the “masses,” or of democracy, but certainly it is truer than it ought to be.
I am really sad to hear that. In 2012, I went with her and a French activist to visit the Mayor of Le-Plessis Robinson (a neo-traditional suburb of Paris) and we both really enjoyed it. I believe that the article I wrote based on that visit will also be in the forthcoming book.
She will be missed. It is a terrible loss.
PS: We enjoyed it tremendously even though the mayor spoke so rapidly that we could not understand 90% of what he said.
Yes, Charles, Mary will indeed be missed. And I am looking forward to your book.