Krier: Politicians, take note

Screen Shot 2016-05-07 at 9.33.55 AM.png

Eupolis, vision for a new European capital proposed by Leon Krier. (Krier)

Léon Krier, the architect, planner, theorist and master cartoonist who hails from Luxembourg, has called upon the European Union to build itself a new capital so that a way out of the world’s gathering problems might be forged. He says politicians need to know more about cities, how they work, how they should be built, and why they should be friendly in their appearance.

Jane Jacobs, whose 100th birthday was observed on Wednesday and whose Jane’s Walk on the Providence riverfront I will lead at 1 p.m. today, was way out in front on all of this.

Krier’s piece in Building Design is called “Politicians would do well to show more interest in urban design.” It reflects much of what readers have read on this blog for many years. The design of buildings and cities shapes the mood of people in aggregate. It is the call of Jacobs, Prince Charles, Roger Scruton, Tony Brussat (see my post “Epiphany in Stuttgart” on my brother’s recent pensée), Andres Duany (at least to some large degree), Nikos Salingaros, Michael Mehaffy and many others. Krier writes:

I remain astonished by how few political and intellectual figureheads are actively interested in the final shape of our frantic development activities. Observing what happened to cities in the last half-century, there is no reason to be buoyant.

While classicists and traditionalists have the right idea on this very important matter, many of them spend their energy counting the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin. Traditional Building magazine recently gave precious inches to the idea that classicists should embrace even more of the dubious thinking that has led the world down the treacherous path toward a Blade Runner built environment.

Rather, they should be working to figure out how modern architecture’s grip on the design and development process from the local level on up can be countered. Evening the playing field for major commissions in cities will not happen by studying Foucault!

Krier wants to build a new capital for the EU – Eupolis – along classical lines. (I would ask why not Europolis, but that would be an angels-on-pinheads question, criticized above.) It is a good idea, but even more unlikely than his recent proposal for a new classical center for music in London. Modernists will squelch both ideas with an application of pressure from their pinky fingers. That is because of one thing: politicians are almost completely ignorant about the built environment and what ails it.

I believe that beauty, as traditionally conceived, should be returned to that environment. This will have major effects on social behavior. Since we still have an abundance of models around the world, and since the public vastly prefers traditional to modern architecture, it is a simple problem to solve. We don’t have to figure it out. It’s not like figuring out how to abolish poverty or improve education, yet it will make those vital tasks easier. We just have to do it. And traditional architecture and planning are far more sustainable than the modernist model that the establishment buys into blindly. The only real problem is how to reform the development process to give the public more input into the way we build cities.

Jane Jacobs, were she alive, would agree. Robert Moses would disagree. Let’s proceed forward from this basic distinction, this basic truth.

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architects, Architecture, Architecture Education, Architecture History, Art and design, Development, Landscape Architecture, Preservation, Providence, Urbanism and planning and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s