John King, read your words!

Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 8.31.46 AM.png

New LinkedIn building in San Francisco. Caption: “We’ll let you pick out which one it is.” (John King)

John King is the architecture critic for the San Francisco Chronicle. I met him maybe a decade ago at a conference and have followed his criticism since. This latest piece, “SF skyline’s new LinkedIn addition built by, for New Yorkers,” about a new building near the S.F. financial district, is excellent, among his best, filled with insight about this ugly building and how it affects the rise and fall of its neighborhood. I was so moved that I left a comment:

John, an excellent assessment of how this LinkedIn building affects its setting. But the same can be written about almost any modernist building inserted into a reasonably nice setting – only an already failed setting would fail to be hurt by this building or any of its hundreds of thousands of mates. However well designed, they reduce rather than improve the quality of any environment that people love. Please take what you have written and try to understand how much more widely it applies to the world of architecture than this one building.

The problem is not, as King says, that this building was designed and built by New Yorkers who do not understand San Francisco. The problem is that this is a building built by modernists who do not understand cities anywhere. It’s not that cities should not evolve; of course they should. But change ought to imply improvement. This is not rocket science.

Almost every architecture critic who takes the “it’s not the style, it’s the quality of the design” line has written one or two articles that are intended to establish their objectivity. They find a modernist building they are pleased as punch to denounce – but do not realize how widely their critique applies to modern architecture as a whole. I wish they would take their own words to heart.

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architects, Architecture, Architecture Education, Architecture History, Art and design, Development, Urbanism and planning and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to John King, read your words!

  1. Steven Semes says:

    Improve, don’t reinvent.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s