I have no way of knowing whether the folks over at the Procaccianti Group have been listening to my critiques of their eight-story extended-stay hotel proposal on the site of the Fogarty Building, but their latest version, above, is much improved.
The original version, below, was so bad that it would not have been worth razing the Fogarty Building for. If a new building cannot be said to improve upon an old one built in the modernist style known as Brutalism, then it must be really, really, really lame. In fact, it looked like it belonged on an airport access road.
Why replace a building we can blame on our fathers with one we would have no alternative but to blame on ourselves?
The new design has a much more distinctly traditional look, emphasizing its verticality, which is appropriate in a high-rise. It is mostly brick, with what the modernists like to call “punched” windows (instead of strips of horizontal fenestration, or glass curtain wall, which they prefer). It has a base, a shaft and a capital, as if it were a classical order. It has a cornice. It seems to have stringcourses. Bravo!
And yet it still seems quite cheesy – a good example of “bad trad.” The cornice looks too truncated, the windows are not “punched” far enough into the “skin” (oops, I mean masonry) to make the walls look strong. And please! Get rid of those extruded metal window slabs, clearly designed to propitiate the modernists on the commission.
But these features can be improved, and doing so would show that the Procaccianti Group understands what makes a city tick. I can hardly wait for the next iteration of this design.
Meanwhile, the First Bristol proposal for another hotel (also of eight stories) on Parcel 12, the triangular land where Memorial Boulevard curves to the south, has also been improved (albeit not perfected). Which hotel will reach the promised land first?
Ladies and gentlemen of the Downtown Design Review Commission, please do not give the Procaccianti design approval before it has been earned!
Pingback: Roses and raspberries, 2015 | Architecture Here and There
Thanks for your details and explanations..I want more information from your side..I Am working in Budget hotel in chennaishould you need for any other clarification please call in this number.044-6565 6523.
Hotel staffWithout exception, we found all of the Cubans we met were genuine, happy people and really friendly but, most of all, they are all extremely proud of their beautiful country. It was refreshing to see real passion in people’s eyes when they spoke to us and Cubans seem to have a certain innocence that you just don’t encounter anywhere else in the world.
My non-architectural suggestion? How about a little matchy-matchy and have the triangular hotel designed in similar fashion – providing some ethnically comfortable anchors? Settling familiarity to rest the eye? And can we please have a moratorium on what I call “Catholic school brick” – that pale tan brick that gives me shivers…and is quite ugly.
Matchy-matchy? That sounds like an architectural suggestion to me, whose merit depends on the architecture itself!
i hope the perspective on the old version was just enhanced by renderer and it doesn’t really george jetson out like that….
I’d feel better if their rendering showed signs of encouraging some streetlife and a good pedestrian experience.
The switch from a starkly modernist to a traditional schema is far from a baby step, which is not to say they don’t have reasonably far to go.