No surrender to Gehry Ike

Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 3.37.16 PM.png

Sculpural grouping in proposed Ike memorial design. (Gehry Partners)

News that the Eisenhower family has been flipped and now supports the design of a proposed memorial to their patriarch by celebrity architect Frank Gehry is depressing, and maybe even predictable, but it’s too early for opponents of the monstrosity to throw in the towel.

Congress, which has a say in the matter, was not notified of the development. Leading members of the Appropriations Committee learned of it only when they got calls from the Washington Free Beacon for a story, “Eisenhower Family Reverses Opposition to Memorial Design.” Beacon reporter Blake Seitz wrote, “The proposed changes are notable in that they do not seem to address the criticisms leveled against the Gehry design by the Eisenhower family when it first announced its opposition in 2012.”

In particular, the steel tapestry (source of its “Iron Curtain” nickname) will remain but will be reconfigured to show the beaches of Normandy today. But the press release asserted that the changes will include increased focus on Eisenhower’s home state – a seeming contradiction, especially inasmuch as the Eisenhowers opposed the tapestry more than its subject, originally trees on a plain in Kansas, and argued that the memorial should pay less attention to his origins and more to his accomplishments.

Removing the tapestry – which with its mammoth blank columns reads more like the substructure of a highway overpass – would render the rest of the memorial much more acceptable to the public. But that will not happen because, to the elites involved in supporting Gehry, a victory for modernism is far more important than a memorial to a leader who is not quite the right cup of tea for most of them.

Anyway, just because the Eisenhower family has bought into a memorial likely to be perceived by future Americans as more about Frank than Ike does not mean that the public must do so. One of the chief arguments of the few supporters of the design was that the memorial should not be held hostage to the approval of Ike’s descendants. Whatever it may have been yesterday, the force of that argument is certainly no less persuasive today.

So those who believe the general should be honored by a memorial that citizens will love and respect should continue to oppose this travesty.

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy,, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.