Duo Dickinson on Trump II

Screen Shot 2016-08-07 at 5.42.27 PM.png

Donald Trump (second from left) at a project site. (Common/Edge)

Three months ago, Connecticut architecture critic Duo Dickinson warned architects that the crowds with pitchforks backing Donald Trump might someday come for them. “Architects’ Trump moment” was well conceived. His latest venture into that political gulch, “Donald Trump as Architecture’s Nightmare Client,” is even better.

Trump thinks he’s right about everything, just like an architect’s nightmare client – often a major developer. To my surprise, Dickinson admits that many architects think they are right about everything, too.

Trump is a stereotype that architects recoil from (and yet occasionally earn a living through). The reason we work for them may be simple narcissism. Many of us are not-so-different from the Trumps of the world. Like a lot of self-directed leaders, the mirror should not just be a vanity vehicle—a good long look may reveal some deeper truths architects tend to shy away from.

So true. And yet, shortly after, Dickinson commits what commentators on the politics of foreign affairs used to call “moral equivalency.” Here he equates a crooked architectural establishment with the profession’s small segment of dissed traditionalists.

Modernist dismissal of any allusion to anything but other Modernist architecture is laughably tone deaf. The fearful outrage of a reactionary traditionalist minority is equally dismissive and judgmental.

That’s like putting the imperfections of the free market on a par with the sins of the totalitarian state. “The fearful outrage of a reactionary traditionalist minority”? Huh? Being oppressed by the architectural establishment is very different from modernists’ tone-deafness to the “allusions” made by their twee architecture. Dickinson comes close to throwing away the credibility he has built up in this essay.

Notwithstanding that – and I could notwithstand it all night, and quadruple the length of this post – please read Dickinson’s brilliant essay – again, on the Common/Edge website.

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Duo Dickinson on Trump II

  1. Love to. I’ll have my computer talk to your computer and set something up.


  2. Thanks! We should have a dialogue about Style(s) sometime!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.