And these are the winners!

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 4.03.31 PM.png

“New York Horizon,” winner, entry of Yitan Sun and Jianshi Wu (U.S.)

Winners have been announced in the 2016 eVolo magazine skyscraper design competition, and they are real doozies. eVolo, which I’d never heard of, exists to discuss “the most avant-garde ideas generated in schools and professional studios around the world,” and the competition certainly does tend to push those goals forward. We chuckle at the result, but be careful. This is where architecture is headed if an adult is not put in charge immediately.

The winning entry, by architects Yitan Sun and Jianshi Wu of the United States, would build a “horizontal skyscraper” reaching around and 1,000 feet down all four sides of a newly sunken Central Park, with the park itself dug out and replaced with what looks like a paradise for people interested in rock climbing, supposedly a mountain once entombed beneath its famously beautiful Olmstedian terrain. Beauty’s so old-hat!

The ambition is to reverse the traditional relationship between landscape and architecture, in a way that every occupiable space has a direct connection to nature. The 1,000-foot tall, 100-feet deep mega structure provides a total floor area of 7 square miles, which is about 80 times greater than the Empire State Building.

This will raise the hairs on the back of Froma Harrop’s neck! call your office! Just as the proposed supertall superthin skyscraper proposed for Sutton Place is bringing its neighbors together in opposition, perhaps this proposal to wall off Central Park will finally unite foes in the longstanding rivalry between the East Side and the West Side.

The second-place winner’s proposed tower, off the southeastern corner of Central Park, is called The Hive, a drone skyscraper, a sort of airport for the gathering future of product delivery. The others are equally absurd, indeed obtuse, and yet equally in sync with the direction modernism is taking us. Each time a modernist architect hatches an even more unique design for his building is a challenge to the architectural community to come up with something even wackier.

Don’t laugh. When I say this is the future, a chuckle will not cut it. Indeed, a defense of the winner just ran in Fast Company/Co-Exist, “This Insane Skyscraper Should Not Be Built in Central Park – But It Should Exist.” (“Might be a step too far,” writes Ben Schiller.) In all seriousness! He adds: “‘In the heart of New York City, a New Horizon is born,’ say the designers, forgoing to mention how it would tear apart the very center of Manhattan.” So when I say architecture is heading in this direction, and fast, I am not just whistling Dixie.

(Hats, including horizontal stovepipes, off to Kristen Richards for running this wackadoodle on her marvelous website!)

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 4.04.58 PM.png

“The Hive,” second, by Hadeel Ayed Mohammad, Yifeng Zhao, Chengda Zhu (U.S.)

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy,, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architects, Architecture, Architecture Education, Architecture History, Art and design, Development, Humor, Landscape Architecture, Urbanism and planning and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to And these are the winners!

  1. fastzander says:

    Dude, I really wouldn’t lose sleep over this. That Central Park whatchamacallit looks and sounds about as likely to be built to me as a space elevator or a transatlantic tunnel.


  2. The thousand ‘ tall, 100 ‘ deep, 7 square mile “Horizontal Skyscraper” would be the perfect place for the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s “Reimagining Modernism” section.

    As for the non modern portions of the Metropolitan Museum of Art; “Horizontal Skyscraper” eliminates them thus following modernism’s mandate to “end history”. Corbu must be radiant.


  3. I was looking forward to your critique. You did not disappoint,


  4. says:

    What crap!

    Sent from my Sprint phone.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.