Where eagles darechitecture

41-West-57th-Street-Midtown-West-Mark-Foster-Gage-Supertall-8.jpg

Proposed 102-story tower for Manhattan. (Mark Foster Gage Architects)

This startling proposal of a supertallsuperthin residential tower showed up on TradArch the other day, sent by David Rau, who objects to the machined element of its ornament. His email set off a long debate about natural and unnatural materials in architecture. A deeply interesting question, but some might be wondering what I, as dedicated as anyone on this planet to the sheer idea of ornament, think of the eagle-bedecked edifice. I have been biding my time, but at last I think I’ll dare to posit a reaction:

Ich schmeck dreck. Ridiculous, yes. But no, not boring.

At least the architect, Mark Foster Gage, is thinking along lines other than the usual glass box or goofball whirly-swirlygig highrise. Gage, a professor and dean at Yale’s school of architecture, is supposedly both a protégé of Robert A.M. Stern and a former drudge of Frank Gehry.

Talk about burning a candle at both ends!

The website 6sqft.com posted “Could This Otherworldly 102-Story Tower Covered in Ornaments be Coming to 57th Street?” by Ondel Hylton, with a profusion of illustrations – necessary because it seems Gage has tried to attach a bit of everything, not just eagles but gears, propellers, all but the kitchen sink, to the façade of his supposedly proposed tower in Manhattan. Ornament can be, as they say, overdone. Hylton writes:

Gage says constructing entire surfaces of ornament is entirely possible since by making things robotically you can create forms with an unlimited amount of detail at the same price as doing something flat.

Nice thought, perhaps, but this might push me even further toward what Andrés Duany – who considers the design’s mere existence a rebuke to “doctrinaire” classicism – calls the camp of the Palladiophiles. Palladio, the Renaissance architect, was not besotted by ornamentation. His palazzos do not swim in embellishment. He knew proportion. He knew propriety. Gage does not pretend to be Palladio, but he knows neither.

I have yet to see a set of rules of propriety that does not beg to be violated – Palladio himself violated his own rules regularly – or at least to be toyed with. Despite appearances, Gage’s tower is not toying with the rules, he is aiming a bazooka at them. Maybe there’s a bazooka somewhere in his design. More likely his design is a bazooka, aimed at the very idea of ornament, whether orthodox or heterodox. His proposal does not seem to have actually been officially proposed. It is merely out there in the blogosphere. Maybe Gage is modernism’s Saul Alinsky.

Below is a building with what some (not I) might call excessive ornament that does not come close to the sins committed by the Gage tower.

house of chimeras.jpg

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architects, Architecture, Architecture Education, Architecture History, Art and design, Urbanism and planning, Video and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Where eagles darechitecture

  1. Pingback: Where eagles darechitecture | RuangAyu

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s