Modernist GMO architecture

Field of wheat creates a landscape of beauty. (nature-hdwallpapers.com)

Field of wheat creates a landscape of beauty. (nature-hdwallpapers.com)

Yesterday evening I had the pleasure of appearing on WPRO’s Coalition Radio with Pat Ford and David Fisher (6 p.m. Saturdays, 630 AM and 99.5 FM). I was preceded on the air by Elizabeth Guardia of Right to Know RI, which supports legislation in the Rhode Island General Assembly to require labeling of GMO foods in this state. As Elizabeth and her associates filed out of the studio, I had the most alarming epiphany:

Typical modernist building. (lifepixel.net)

Typical modernist building. (lifepixel.net)

Typical traditional building. (knoji.com)

Typical traditional building. (knoji.com)

Corncob column capital at U.S. Capitol. (flickr.com)

Corncob column capital at U.S. Capitol. (flickr.com)

Modern architecture is GMO architecture.

GMOs are foods produced by manipulating the gene content of agricultural products. The acronym stands for genetically modified organisms. Instead of mating cows that produce more milk or corn that resists bugs better, as has been done for centuries, strains of corn or cattle feed that accomplishes those goals is produced in a laboratory by manipulating genetic material. GMO opponents think people have a right to know whether food they buy at their groceries was produced using this process. The big fear is that the practice, and research into its safety, has not gone on long enough to ascertain whether it carries hidden dangers.

Likewise, as I pointed out yesterday for the listening audience, modern architecture turns centuries of design practice on its head. Modern architects pride themselves on the novelty of their designs. They ignore best practices evolved over generations to produce the safest, most useful and most attractive buildings. They specialize in, and indeed revel in, the untried and (reluctant as they’d be to admit it) the untrue.

But what scientists are learning is that human neurobiological traits that hark back to our evolutionary survival of the fittest are embedded in traditional architecture. Ornament in particular reflects the information that early humans gathered from their environment to detect, often by instinct, threats ranging from poison in vegetation to tigers in trees. We do not need that sort of information today, but our brains still crave it. Architecture without embellishment literally makes us uneasy, according to such theorists as Nikos Salingaros, a mathematician at the University of Texas in San Antonio. (Full disclosure: I am editing his latest book on the biophilic healing properties in architecture.)

On the other hand, traditional architecture reflects the organized complexity of nature, and is naturally soothing and even alluring to people. Traditional architecture evolves over time in ways that reflect the way nature evolves and reproduces. The slow food movement is the cuisine equivalent of removing GMOs from buildings and the built environment. Modern architecture, alas, labels itself. Consciously and unconsciously, most people prefer traditional to modern architecture. It’s not just “a matter of taste.”

Over a quarter of a century I have blazed new trails in the art of demonizing modern architecture. In recent years, science has become a major ally in that endeavor. So I thank Right to Know RI and Coaltion Radio at WPRO for identifying another arrow for my rhetorical quiver.

Here are links to WPRO. The third link takes you to the Coalition website where you can click on Coalition #74 and hear my rant beginning at 34:00 minutes into the show:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Coalition_Radio
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheCoalitionRadio
Web: http://www.coalitionradio.us/
WPRO: http://www.coalitionradio.us/live-broadcast.html

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Architecture History, Art and design, Books and Culture, Rhode Island and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Modernist GMO architecture

  1. Pingback: Blog 1: Mind Map, Research & Introduction – BIAD x Critical and Cultural Studies

  2. We right here at the Anarchy household, contain made the decision toward sell natural and organic seeds. We are selling real, organic, unaltered seeds for greens, roots, and fruits.Shopping for organic and natural inside of the United states of america basically doesn’t exist. Monsanto owns the trademark for all heirloom varieties. There are no accurate natural or genuine seeds or meals inside of the United Says as of 2004. Here inside of Denmark, it is unlawful in the direction of seek the services of genetically improved a little something. There are no un-organic farms or seeds. There are legal guidelines banning any GMO model or transformed place of work from delivering just about anything to the public below. The basically seeds we can just take our fingers upon are genuine, natural, seeds. Buy them for your present-day back garden or for your foreseeable future employ. If your self are a “prepper” on your own comprehend how crucial People could possibly be quickly. Make sure you leave me a personalized message at GooglePlus or through E-mail at wearelegion@unseen.is with your acquire and we will receive right back again in direction of your self with the transaction details for the duration of paypal. Delivery selling price is $20.00 flat (if it goes higher than we will include it) and it is $2.25 for every seed. You should employ the service of the abbreviations presented inside the order. We include a bare minimum Three seeds for each plant type. For each acquire of $100 or even more we will incorporate a reward by e mail toward you!We can send your self any of those people seeds detailed here. We will fortunately develop as this takes off, consequently Remember to Percentage WITH EVERYONE!!! If you contain any special seed (not weed) requests, you should allow for us know and we can view if we are ready in direction of receive them towards oneself. Obtain us at: http://seeds.saianarchy.com/

    Like

  3. David Andreozzi AIA says:

    David B,

    I might argue the opposite.

    Most great developing architecture uses historic precedent but then genetically modifies it to a newer use, a better technology, or a fresher interpretive artistic statement. This is all good because the principles of the design remain the primary building blocks on the DNA. In food, the new Frankenfood may look better, use less water, and be disease resistant, but we have no idea how those changes affect our human bodies. In architecture, the commodity, firmness, and delight are completely visible to be evaluated and judged by the functional success of the building and it public acceptance.

    I think your argument becomes stronger if you relate architecture to the Slow Food movement which tries to link the food on your table to the local vernacular around you and in effort to protect the community, culture and environment. Yes, the unknown implications of GMO’s are part of that, but the larger Slow Food movement (as I understand it) is more about eating what’s grown naturally around you. What fruits, vegetables, and meats are indigenous to you local vernacular in its weather, topography, and cultural history. That is the DNA that is stripped out of egoistic starchitecture.

    Fondly,

    Dave A

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s