A new stage for Emerson College

Emerson College's new L.A. campus, by Thom Mayne. (Los Angeles Times)

Emerson College’s new L.A. campus, by Thom Mayne. (Los Angeles Times)

I spent a year in Boston at Emerson College in 1973-74 when it was still on Beacon Street. After I left Boston I heard that Emerson was planning to move out to the suburbs, or rather to Lawrence, Mass. Then, visiting Boston again years later, I discovered that the school, which is primarily devoted to the performance arts, had moved instead to nearby Boylston and Tremont streets, into exquisite set of old commercial buildings, one more glorious than the next. To walk in this stretch of Boston’s old theater district as the students crowd the sidewalk preparing, in their elegant way, to launch their evenings of fun, is pure bliss. These are indeed tomorrow’s “beautiful people” strolling among yesterday’s beautiful buildings.

Then, late last night, by way of an e-mail warning me of a new building by the egregious Thom Mayne, I learned that Emerson had opened a new campus on Sunset Strip, in Los Angeles. Here is Christopher Hawthorne’s L.A. Times review of the “campus,” with 22 illustrations, including the one on top of this post.

My correspondent has a daughter spending the semester trapped in this abomination. My prayers go out to her. My wife, when I showed her the picture, went online and saw some reviews, including one whose headline referred to its beauty. “Beauty?” she said, “It looks like World War III.” Hawthorne himself is adept at finding many comparisons that symbolize the “stage” that “frames” Emerson’s focus on performance. He adeptly identifies its precedents in modern architecture, including a similar rectangular arch shape visible (alas!) from the Arc de Triomphe in the La Defense area. And he perceives some of the flaws in the design concept of the campus. He compares it to “the alien popping out of Sigourney Weaver’s stomach.” And yet he likes it.

Hawthorne’s attitude sums up the self-referential, cynical, inhumane attitude of modern architecture and its acolyte critics, of whom Hawthorne is undoubtedly a talented example. He and his fellow design mavens and the architects over whom they drool understand that the architecture of today does not do much for the actual humans who must use it. The architectural establishment embraces a bastardization of “L’art pour l’art,” an artistic philosophy that emerged in the late 1900s as a rejection by bohemian artists of the bourgeois money that kept them in their garrets with a good supply of sultry posing slatterns, but which threatened to constrain their “creativity” to maintain the sale of their work – some of which was becoming obnoxious to the eyes of the hands that fed them. But a building is not the same thing as a painting, or even a sculpture, which can be easily hidden away in a museum once the fad has passed. Someday, the public is going to rise against the ugliness with which architecture has been populating our cities and towns. Then, when artists resume the essential humility that is the proper attitude of art toward humanity, the good times will roll and beauty will resume its … well, I can hope, can’t I?

 

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Art and design, Urbanism and planning and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A new stage for Emerson College

  1. Cliff says:

    Looks like a futuristic spaceport, a ship has just landed and the gangplank lowered. Seriously, it’s a confused composition. One wonders, did the architect get enough hugs when he was a child?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.