A White House ballroom

Recently poposed lstate ballroom, to be erected in a building separate from the main presidential installations (East Wing, etc.) at 1600 Pwnnsylvania Avenue. (images courtesy of McCrery Architects)

What we really need in this country, in the nation’s capital for god’s sake, is a grand new state ballroom to host White House guests – dignitaries foreign and domestic – presidents and such like – at yuge parties with a sumptuosity never before seen at the White House.

Whatever you think of Trump, the nation has long ago grown to a stature that calls for dinners, dances and events in a facility of this magnificance. America is clearly reaching out for that stature now. Such a facility has now been proposed. It will not only be good for whatever whim our dancer-in-chief might feel inclined to sport, but American taxpayers will not be required to foot the bill. Trump and other supermoneybags have, in the words of a White House press release, “generously committed to donating the funds necessary to build this approximately $200 million structure.”

Today the White House can host a party of only 200 invitees in a tent 100 feet from the White House entrance. The new ballroom, which will replace the East Wing and be built by McCrery Architects, of Washington, D.C., will host up to 650 people. “It has been untouched since the Harry Truman administration,” said McCrery of the East Wing.”I am honored that President Trump has entrusted me to help bring this beautiful and necessary renovation to The People’s House, while preserving the elegance of its classical design and historical importance.”

The White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles, said that the president “is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail. The [p]resident and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserve the special history of the White House while building a beautiful ballroom that can be enjoyed by future administrations and generations of Americans to come.”

The East Wing, originally built in 1902, was given a second story in 1940 and renovated or remodeled many times. At 90,000 square feet, the big new room will embrace the heritage and the classicism of the main complex – a style appropriate to presidential buildings. Their current resident’s gilded ego will, I trust, appear rarely if at all in the new building. (It may be expected that Trump’s overgilt style will be avoided by the architect.) James McCrery, has too much taste for that.

Trump has made clear in executive orders and other acts (including those of Congress) since the outset of his administration that he seeks to promote the growing New Classicism movement afoot in the nation today. The ballroom will be a good example of that, as the architect’s illustrations above and below suggest. The project is slated to begin in September and be completed well before the next presidential term,

So, in the words of the immortal Elton John, Saturday night’s all right for fighting. Let’s build this thing!

Actually I suppose, ahem!, they were the words of Bernie Taupin.

The proposed ballroom will be separate from most of the presidential complex.

Unknown's avatar

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Architecture History and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to A White House ballroom

  1. trewinb's avatar trewinb says:

    I am in total agreement with Anthony: the problem is the scale in relation to the residence itself. Could it not have been recessed to reduce the height?
    The other issue is the process, or lack of process.

    Like

  2. LazyReader's avatar LazyReader says:

    200 Million dollars It will forever be known as the “epstein Memorial Ballroom” whether trump likes it or not. remember how they cut a bunch of stuff like social programs, health, science, and more due to “wasted government spending”?

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Anonymous says:

    I’m afraid it is out of scale with the original building, and while with McCreary the detailing will be fine, the overall design needs a whole lot more thought. If this is really to be done, then rushing things is not the way to go.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to LazyReader Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.