Minnette de Silva smiles at comment by Corbusier, in 1947. (Frieze)
Sometimes it seems like open season on female architects as long as they are in cahoots with the roving eye of Le Corbusier, one of the founding fathers of modern architecture. There is the recurrent hullaballoo over Eileen Gray, whose Mediterranean beach house Corbu vandalized via obscene graffiti when she was away. Then there was the stinkpot of British reporter Taya Zinken’s recollections of Corbu’s offensive behavior to her at Chandigarh.
There is much more titillation that brevity forces me to exclude.
Now there’s the new book out that transforms Sri Lankan modernist Minnette de Silva’s friendship with the Corbusier, starting in 1947, into a fictional affair. Isn’t this a little over the top? Shiromi Pinto’s Plastic Emotions is reviewed in the Guardian; Shahidha Bari offers the following description:
Looking at the photograph (at left), it seems unsurprising that this real-life encounter and the exchange of letters that followed should have provided Pinto with the bones of her story. Plastic Emotions is an exercise in romantic speculation. Pinto imagines the nature of the relationship that develops between the 29-year‑old Sri Lankan and the ageing pioneer of urban modernism. She gives them trysts, meaningful exchanges, a separation and then painful longing, ending only with Le Corbusier’s death in 1965.
Actually, I wonder if the word “unsurprising” in that paragraph should have been changed by an editor to “surprising.”
I have not read the book so maybe it is unfair for me to comment, but its title does not speak well on the Great Man’s behalf. Well, did they have an affair or not? Le Corbusier was famously disloyal to his wife, mostly left behind in Paris, and it is hard to imagine him failing to fall for the lovely Sri Lankan. If they had a romantic interlude, however brief, it is hard to imagine Corbu’s legions of chroniclers not reporting it. Bari is coy on this in her article; ditto Pinto, who wrote the book. Nor, it seems, did de Silva ever retreat from her loyalty to Corbu’s architecture, so far as I can tell. She was the first Asian woman to join the Royal Institute of British Architects.
I might never have dedicated my blog to such an inconclusive topic but for the concluding lines of another article, also in the Guardian (“The brilliant female architect forgotten by history“), by Pinto herself. Describing a recent modernist project in Sri Lanka’s capital city, she quotes another architect on what de Silva might have thought of it:
“She would have hated it,” says Selva Sandrapragas, a British architect who worked with De Silva in her later years. “It displays no sensitivity to the history, culture or geography of where it is. It wraps itself around the old city, destroying the former context, suffocating it from the sea. It could literally be anywhere: Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong.”
The question is how does that distinguish this prototypical modernist project from anything designed by Corbu?
(My hat is off to Audun Engh, of INTBAU – the International Network of Traditional Building, Architecture & Urbanism – for sending me word of the Guardian’s articles on Minnette de Silva.)
Architecture Here and There 
Progressive liberal media regularly run items on forgotten alleged ‘brilliant’ architects, composers and whatever, these are then accompanied by the usual accusations that it is due to bad males that these woman have been forgotten.
They have templates for this which they run regularly.
The basic template format is:
– the subject of forgotten and overshadowed female brilliance
– suggest male chauvinism as the certain cause
– a bit of sensational gossip to make it spicy, some facts, wild speculation and bla-bla to fill up the article.
The facts, details and bla-bla in the article are, besides filling up the article, also meant to signal erudition and to be cultured, so equally is the reader. What must stick is the progressive ideological agenda, brilliant female, male chauvinist pigs. They run this sort of stuff also regularly on liberal progressive classical radio stations.
The public, already suffering under the brutality of modernist architecture, deserves more than such gossip, slander, wild speculation, and, what is merely run for purposes of ideological propaganda, even if it is good for the traditionalists cause. Though too much attention for personalities is not exactly a sign of potency of the movement.
LikeLike