Salingaros on Millais’ Corbu

Screen Shot 2018-01-02 at 3.24.15 PM.png

Architect Le Corbusier (1887-1965) with a model of a building. (NPR)

What a pleasure to learn that a friend of mine has reviewed a book written by another friend of mine. Of course, that might not be so great if one friend panned the other. That is not the case here, thankfully. Both pan the subject of the book. Architectural theorist Nikos Salingaros, the reviewer, calls Malcolm Millais’s new book, Le Corbusier, the Dishonest Architect, a “refreshing analysis of a towering figure.” In short, Salingaros loves Millais’s scalding treatment modern architecture’s most influential founder.

In his review, titled “Dimensions of Failure” in this month’s issue of The New English Review, Salingaros writes:

Le Corbusier is supposed to have saved humankind from its retrograde and stubborn habits of building humane settlements. Like other prophets before him, he revealed immutable laws to the ignorant masses, such as the nostalgic folly of ornamenting their houses, and the futility of wishing to raise their children in friendly spaces and gardens.

Dr. Millais instead offers a contrarian opinion: “The truth is [that Le Corbusier] was a sham, a fake, a charlatan whose only gift was for self-publicity.”

Millais uses facts and reasoned arguments to show that Le Corbusier was ignorant of tectonics, as his canonical buildings have been falling apart since their day of completion. Millais exhaustively collects results from many other investigators; some crucial biographical ones from as late as 2015, when Le Corbusier was exposed as an anti-Semitic Nazi-Fascist collaborator.

Most of the goods Millais has on Corbusier are known to scholars but have been suppressed by the architectural establishment. And you can understand why after reading excerpts from the Corbusier file. For example, Here’s how Corbusier described his Philips Pavilion, designed for the 1958 Brussels World’s Fair:

It should appear as though you are about to enter a slaughterhouse. Then once inside, bang, a blow to the head and you’re gone.

Based on Millais’s reporting, the exaggeration here is fairly minimal. Salingaros, reacting, writes:

So, Monty Python’s 1987 The Architects Sketch starring John Cleese was spot-on after all.

Salingaros adds from his own files on Corbusier the architect’s reaction to a client’s complaint that her balconies have no railings.

The good woman was afraid that when her sons get married their children would fall off and kill themselves, as if I cared. As if I, Le Corbusier, would compromise with design for the sake of her unborn brats!

Millais piles up evidence like this, kept for decades in dark closets across the architectural establishment.

A recurrent theme throughout this biography, like the refrain in a children’s song, is Le Corbusier’s dishonesty: lying, stealing originality from anybody he could, betraying those who helped him, being driven by opportunism, and stepping over cadavers in his monomaniacal quest for glory. Again, these facts are routinely suppressed so that architecture students don’t get frightened. Or maybe it is in order to shield an architectural culture that has made lots of money and achieved immense global power by embracing these same vices.

Considering the power of the cult of Corbu, Salingaros doubts that architects will ever wake up to the sins of the god they worship:

This excellent book by Malcolm Millais should have been around for the last fifty years. It might have saved us from architectural and urban design mistakes, now ingrained in architectural and planning cultures. As Millais says, “This is not a book for architects.” No revelation—no matter how shocking—can tarnish this hero’s reputation among architectural true believers. Yet we need to delete Le Corbusier’s ideas from practice if our world is to become healthy once again.

(My review of Malcolm Millais’s fine book is here.)

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy,, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Book/Film Reviews and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s