Fix in on worse Ike Gehry

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 8.49.33 PM.png

General Eisenhower speaks with men of the 101st Airborne on June 5, 1944. (National Archives)

Catesby Leigh, writing in City Journal, reports the terrible news about the Frank Gehry designed proposal for an Eisenhower memorial. The formerly skeptical Eisenhower family now backs it. President Trump now backs it. In his proposed 2018 budget, Trump throws $45 million at a project (stiffed for years by Congress) that in every facet epitomizes the swamp Trump promised to drain. Leigh itemizes the counts in that indictment in his essay, entitled “Monumental Folly: The proposed memorial to President Eisenhower becomes even less appealing.”

The subtitle refers to the recent rejection by the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts of proposed alterations. One switches out the Kansas landscape in the design’s colossal “tapestry” for a landscape of today’s beach at Normandy. Another relocates the statue of the young Ike so as to kill off the memorial’s only (if not saving) grace note – the statue of the boy looking in awe at statuary representing his accomplishments as a man.

Leigh brilliantly explains the difference between Gehry’s fatuous exercise in self-indulgence and a real work of memorialization. “The Lincoln Memorial, for example, does not tell us the story of Abraham Lincoln. It enshrines his memory in a majestic temple while the statue within evokes the essence of the martyred president—his thoughtfulness and determination.”

Still, Leigh’s article is the most depressing thing I’ve read in a long time. The prospect of blocking the abhorrent Gehry design, which so recently seemed so close, was the biggest story in architecture, at least in bringing media attention to the important battle between traditional and modernist architecture. “The memorial’s recently anticipated completion date of June 6, 2019 – D-Day’s 75th anniversary – is probably out of reach,” writes Leigh. “But it’s going to get built.” At his essay’s conclusion, with a punchy permit joke, Leigh tries to lift the spirits of those who consider Gehry’s design a paean to himself and an insult to Ike. But he doffs his cap to sad reality:

In a less imperfect world, President Trump’s secretary of the Interior, Ryan Zinke, would refuse to dignify Gehry’s scheme with a building permit. … But that’s a happier ending than the Washington swamp will likely accommodate.

Catesby Leigh believes that the cause has indeed been lost – or so it seems. (Well, I do live in a state whose motto is Hope.)

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Fix in on worse Ike Gehry

  1. From Chapter 19 of my book with Michael Mehaffy “Design for a Living Planet”.

    “Eisenhower Memorial Proposed Design by Frank Gehry: A product of archaic industrial technology and its thinking.”

    So much for pretend innovation. Poor Ike was strongly against the Military-Industrial Complex, and this is the system’s revenge. But if the élite wants a monument to itself, the élite is going to get its way. It always does.

    Regards,
    Nikos

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s