The ‘architecture’ of CVS

Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 12.59.26 PM.png

The pace of development drags in West Warwick, R.I., as in many other places, and the allure of a CVS drugstore grows. CVS, whose national headquarters is in Woonsocket, will not, it appears, even give special dispensation to a fellow municipal denizen of the Ocean State. The company insists on the ugliest architecture it can get away with. The Arctic Village Redevelopment Agency was recently turned down flat when it tried to get CVS to offer more embellishments for its proposed store in that community.

In the case of Arctic, it is supposedly the developer, who plans to build the building and lease the space to CVS, who is the villain. But if CVS raised the level of its architecture all across the board, not to good but to acceptable, it would still profit. The developer rejects improved architecture because it knows that’s the standard response at CVS to citizens who want to improve their communities. If developers insisted on something better, CVS would have to submit. If CVS insisted on something better, developers would have to submit. If citizens (customers) insisted on something better, both would have to submit. The cost of mouthwash might end up rising a penny. Or not.

On top of this post is a photograph of a decent CVS in Bexley, a suburb of Columbus, Ohio. At the bottom of this post is the CVS designed and pre- approved for Arctic – the one that the AVRA bent over backward to ask kindly for improvements. One sometimes has to resist the temptation to conclude that CVS hates the people and communities that are its meat and potatoes. Else why would it inflict this on them?

On CVS, Ignorance, and Bad Formula Retail,” by Andrew Faulkner, is from a blog in St. Louis, nextstl.com, that follows CVS and other big-box retail trends. Here is a key passage from Faulkner’s article:

Bexley became famous in the mid-1990’s for preferring an empty porn shop to a new McDonalds franchise. In the end it took over a decade for McDonalds to open a location. Cognizant of recent history and focused on the location, CVS worked under a stringent set of local planning guidelines to open a location at 2532 E. Main Street in 2006.

If Arctic, and West Warwick, and any Rhode Island community wants to get some respect from CVS, it is going to have to dig in its heels and demand to be respected. Most other places cannot have their citizens travel to CVS headquarters and make a big stink. But people from Rhode Island can. And most people involved in the development process – private businessmen, government regulators, regular citizens – don’t like being obnoxious. But incivility is certainly getting a leg up this year. If citizens and their elected (and appointed) leaders want to free their communities from the crap that CVS typically offers, they’ll have to grit their teeth and act like jackasses. Otherwise CVS and its ilk will not give them the time of day.

Other communities with guts and moxie have done it. Rhode Islanders have a longer history of in-your-faceness than most other places (remember the Gaspee). Maybe it’s time to consider something along those lines. And perhaps not just in regard to CVS.

Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 9.09.20 PM.png

Design of CVS proposed for Arctic, in West Warwick, R.I.

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Rhode Island and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The ‘architecture’ of CVS

  1. Arnold Berke says:

    Great article, although it points up the sad fact that towns and cities still don’t have that much control over the architecture of these infill corporate stores. The planning inches forward, requiring to-the-sidewalk placement, for example, but the architecture is still largely dreck. (And will somebody please ban the curlicue light standards screwed onto seemingly every retail outlet in the country? Cities banned back-lit panel signs, only to have these as their odious replacement).

    Like

  2. Anonymous says:

    However, something should have been said before the plans were initially approved… there are other places where CVS did change the coloration and some of the structure. I was recently in Texas for example, and the building was in a very Mexican style area, and the build had a Mexican flavor to it, it looked like it belonged in the neighborhood.

    Like

  3. barry schiller says:

    I’m not that sympathetic to CVS as in Mineral Spring Ave in my town of North Providence, barely a blade of grass anywhere on or around their vast parking lot as they apparently ignored the town landscaping requirements which my town rarely enforced, maybe worth a picture to see that.

    Like

  4. Anonymous says:

    Of course, people would have to recognize this as bad architecture, which they do not have any concern or understanding of..

    Like

    • You are right, Anon., and that is a big problem. But in 1776 colonists had to recognize that King George was bad, and in the end, and in the face of many who preferred to turn the other cheek, our independence was won.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s