Rybczynski on concert halls

auditoriumtheatre.org.png

Longitudinal section concert hall in Chicago’s Auditorium. (auditoriumtheatre.org)

I have not spared the architecture critic Witold Rybczynski my critique of his dithering on the greatest architectural questions of our time, but his latest piece, “The Concert Hall, Reimagined,” in Architect journal on the removal of concert halls from their urban contexts is excellent. I just wish he’d read the damned thing!

Screen Shot 2016-06-16 at 12.26.05 PM.png

Auditorium facade. (zbaren.com)

If he did, he might rediscover some plain truths, eternal verities and the like that still apply to architecture, however anathema to its establishment. Foremost is his apparent (and gratifying) disdain for the ugliness of the new iconic halls – and their abandonment of civic life. Both apply not just to modernist concert halls but to a damning degree of the broader swath of modern architecture. Were he to apply his thoughts in this article to the extent they are applicable to modern architecture generally, he would have to come to see that, regarding architecture’s style wars, it’s way past time for him to get off the fence.

Rybczynski speaks kindly of the Auditorium in Chicago designed by Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler, completed in 1886, and he includes a longitudinal section (a drawing that lets you see through walls into the structure of a building) of the hall. It shows how so much of the Auditorium was part of the fabric of Congress Street and Michigan Boulevard. At the top of this post I have placed a similar longitudinal section of just the concert hall part of the building. It does not illustrate Rybczynski’s point as well as the section that he uses in his article (reprinted below) but it does a better job of showing off Sullivan’s love for incorporating artistic embellishment into the buildings structure. It also shows how the art of architectural illustration has fallen off since then.

The modernists that Rybczynski normally coddles kidnapped Sullivan long ago and placed him in a museum exhibit case whose label describes his legacy as a “precursor to modernism.” Don’t believe a word of it.

Kudos to Architect magazine for running the Rybczynski’s piece. Architect is the mouthpiece of the American Institute of Architects, a stronghold of modernist sentiment in the field, so the article must have caused unease among its editors and the institute’s apparatchiks. Their consciences would be clearer and their minds more at ease if the organization promoted the full range of styles in American architecture. Nowadays, the AIA is even airing TV ads hoping to mollify the public’s disdain for modernism. It will have to do a lot more than just run an occasional piece friendly to traditional design.

I have placed the longitudinal used by Rybczynski and an illustration of the broader city context below, both from a fine website about the Auditorium, auditoriumtheatre.org, that originates at Roosevelt University, in Chicago.

Screen Shot 2016-06-16 at 11.25.12 AM.png

Longitudinal section showing concert hall space amid Auditorium. (Architect)

Screen Shot 2016-06-16 at 11.28.37 AM.png

Illustration of Chicago setting of the Auditorium Building. (auditoriumtheatre.org)

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s