What’s next for the Frick?

Cancelled plan for addition to Frick Museum. (Frick)

Cancelled plan for addition to Frick Museum. (Frick)

The news reported by the New York Times’s architecture writer, Robin Pogebrin (“Frick Museum Abandons Contested Renovation Plan“), leaves me with mixed emotions.

The Frick Collection, on Fifth Avenue. (Wikipedia)

The Frick Collection, on Fifth Avenue. (Wikipedia)

2014-06-27-frickcollection2_michaeldunnviaflickr2006-thumb-1

The Viewing Garden, by British landscape architect Russell Page. (From “Gardens of Russell Page”)

Over time, my skepticism grew regarding the traditional addition proposed for the Frick. The house was designed in 1914 by Carrère & Hastings, for industrialist Henry Clay Frick; an addition by John Russell Pope opened in 1935. Eventually, I signed a petition against the latest proposal, largely because it would have demolished classical additions to the building in the 1970s, including one by John Barrington Bayley, one of Henry Hope Reed’s associates in starting Classical America in 1969.

My skepticism remains sizable. Still, my initial support for the expansion arose because classical additions to classical buildings are so rare these days. A highly visible demonstration such as this addition to the Frick would help the public understand how the city’s beauty can be augmented by such a strategy. That strategy would have seemed obvious half a century ago, but today the obvious is what most bears – indeed requires – repeating.

And yet … and yet. Eyebrows could only arch upward at the identity of the firm selected for the design – Davis Brody Bond, which was responsible for the modernist interior of the underground 9/11 museum at the World Trade Center memorial. Plus, while the project’s initial rendering looked very nice, the devil is in the details – and maybe the program really was too large for the institution’s own good.

It is not just the beautiful classicism of the Frick that the public loves, but the intimacy of the place. It is an enchanting residential space imagined by a connoisseur of the arts – a tradition also exemplified by the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston and the former Barnes Foundation, now removed to Philadelphia.

Indeed, it is the example primarily of the Barnes that is worrisome in light of what is to come of the Frick. Abandoning the Frick expansion plan does not end the project, it only forces it into a new configuration, smaller and classical, one expects … but maybe not.

The Barnes had been located in a lovely classical building in Lower Merion, Pa., designed by Paul Philippe Cret and completed in 1922. The will of its founder, Albert C. Barnes, insisted that the museum was to remain as it was at his death, to be curated as a house museum with an extraordinary collection. Yet in the 2012, a huge new museum opened in central Philadelphia, designed by Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, whose 2001 folk art museum, demolished by MoMA, resembles the Barnes’s fraudulent fractal texture.

If the future of the Frick in any way resembles that of the beloved old Barnes, heads will roll, if not in reality then on this blog. “Quit while you’re ahead” may not be the best solution to the problems facing the Frick, but let’s hope classicists do not rue the day they ganged up on what seemed like a potentially great addition. Let us hope that the Frick’s board finds an answer that avoids damaging a great institution.

Let me suggest that a new classical building be erected on land nearby to hold offices and collection overflow from the Frick. I’m not sure that’s feasible, financially or otherwise, but it would solve the existing problem – if indeed there is a problem and not just a board of directors filled with the need to demonstrate the importance of their existence.

About David Brussat

For a living, I edit the writing of some of the nation's leading architects, urbanists and design theorists. This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. My freelance writing and editing on that topic and others addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts, and a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to invest your prose with even more style and clarity, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Architecture History, Art and design, Development, Urbanism and planning and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s