Kennedy Plaza is still at risk

Downtown Providence, with its its bus hub at the city center, left of Burnside Park. (Arup)

Efforts by the city and state governments to make Kennedy Plaza ugly have not yet succeeded in making it fail. But the attempt to ruin the central public square of Providence is ongoing. The plaza’s beauty has diminished greatly since its Art Nouveau waiting kiosks were replaced by sterile modernist ones, but the plaza remains an effective main hub for public transit.

Not for long, though, if city and state transportation officials have their way.

They have already added new waiting kiosks in the Jewelry District that look like equipment from a torture chamber (or, less harshly, an ironing board). Now, in addition to ramming through a new multi-hub plan opposed by the bus-riding public, they are planning to “re-envision” aspects of Waterplace Park, the river walks, the pedestrian tunnels under Memorial Boulevard and Exchange Terrace, and other downtown amenities.

According to a news report by SmartCitiesWorld, the engineering firm Arup, hired to design this “single cohesive vision.”  The “placemaking modifications” include:

a cohesive artistic lighting plan; shade structures and two temporary liner buildings at the Providence Rink; a utility plan for Waterplace Park, the tunnels, and Riverwalk between Francis and Steeple streets; a programming plan for the central plaza area at Kennedy Plaza; and a series of modifications to make Waterplace Park and the Riverwalk more accessible and pedestrian friendly. Overall climate resilience in Waterplace Park and along the Riverwalk will also be addressed.

Much of that sounds benign. No doubt these areas can be improved. The river-relocation project of 1990-1996, which daylighted the downtown rivers and created Waterplace, the river walks and a dozen elegant bridges, is almost a quarter of a century old, and is showing its age. For example, there is much spawling on too many of the bridges. Fine. Yet maybe that’s not what this is all about. Curious motives seem to emerge in boilerplate language from Arup:

There has never been a more important time for us to set a new benchmark for inclusivity, equity, respect and ownership of these shared spaces, ensuring that accessibility means access for all, not just for some.

They probably say that to all the cities!

And yet, at a time of exceptionally constrained city and state budgets, what does it really mean?

What is this “new benchmark”? Where in the public spaces now targeted for “improvement” have such values as inclusivity, equity, respect, ownership and accessibility been slighted? Are these parks, bridges and river walks not open to all? Is there some sort of stroll tax levied to enter the grounds?

It is obvious that there are no such constraints on the use or enjoyment of these relatively new urban features, paid for almost exclusively by taxpayers outside of Providence and Rhode Island. If there are constraints in the offing, they are the burdensome bus transfers and walking distances to be required of users by the proposed multi-hub system, especially the most needy users. (My post “Still attacking Kennedy Plaza,” from August, focuses on the multiple hubs.)

More than anything else, the “single cohesive vision” sounds like a perfect opportunity to waste taxpayer money on things that aren’t needed.

Because of the masterful work decades ago by the late Bill Warner, who led the effort to redesign the waterfront, the city of Providence and the state of Rhode Island transformed rivers covered up little by little over a century into an urban paradise. This work successfully revived the city’s fortunes. Warner recognized that historic beauty was the capital city’s saving grace, and designed the new waterfront to reflect the legacy of its past. Warner’s accomplishments belong to all citizens, and they must be protected from those whose vision of the future cannot abide its glorious past.

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Development and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Kennedy Plaza is still at risk

  1. barry schiller says:

    Many good points in this post! I’d note the city already had a plan to improve Kennedy Plaza, keeping a convenient central bus hub but reducing the size of its presence, combining the skating rink with Burnside Park into one large public space. All stakeholders were consulted in its development and all agreed except Joe Paolino who announced a lawsuit in opposition – he wanted to get the bus riders, disproportionately poor and of color, out of the Plaza. Instead of defending its plan, the city caved to Paolino and the Governor who seems to listen only to Joe.
    Too bad because with the transit bond voters approved the funds were there to make improvements, instead they will be squandered to make transit worse. Its sad because good transit access from all directions is downtown’s one transportation advantage over sprawlville where it will always be easier to drive and park. So making transit worse will likely make downtown worse no matter how many taxpayer dollars this out of town consultant receives.

    Like

    • Thank you, Barry. It’s sad to see the drastic fall-off in talent and imagination at the agencies that form our downtown and our transportation networks. Very sad. What has happened to Joe Paolino?

      Like

  2. timgerrish says:

    The cobblestone waterplace park walks are inappropriate for an urban park begging people to stroll. Even without high heels they are ankle twisting. I can only imagine what it feels like in a whellchair.

    Like

    • I’ve walked on those walkways hundreds of times without twisting my ankle. The uneven surface was even more uneven originally, but the cobbles were later reset with more concrete between them. This may still be more difficult for some people to navigate, and they might prefer a smooth, Cianci-esque “fix is in” style concrete pavement, but they are still allowed to use and enjoy the river walks. Perhaps they should try strolling slowly, which is often the only possible speed on a WaterFire night.

      Like

  3. Peter Van Erp says:

    Maybe they can repair the College and Crawford Street bridges before they collapse. We don’t even need an international reknowned engineering firm to do that!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.