The Future Symphony Institute’s newest fellow, the composer John Borstlap, has written the latest in a string of essays that speak of music in ways that bring to mind architecture. Here is a paragraph from “Classical Modernity“:
Is there any fundamental contradiction found in putting a CD with a Mozart symphony in the player while driving a modern car on a paved road through the suburban sprawl of a big, modern city? Or in performing a piece by J.S. Bach on a piano, or his Brandenburg Concerti on modern instruments? Or in viewing a Vermeer painting dressed in modern “clothes” – the canvas being lightened by carefully adjusted spotlights which were unthinkable in the 17th century? The Historically Informed Performance (HIP) movement in music, which presents music from the past on old, authentic instruments or else on exact copies of them, is a very modern phenomenon and nobody would demand that such performances are presented with the musicians dressed in 18th-century garb, with candles on their music stands. On the contrary, successful ensembles like John Eliot Gardiner’s Orchestre Revolutionnaire et Romantique, though composed of period instruments, use all the modern means and recording facilities available to spread their vision – which does not in the least diminish other possible interpretations of the same music. It all forms a rich palette of varied artistic experience which is the hallmark of true modernity.
This brings to mind the many times I’ve confronted the argument so beloved of modern architects: that a new traditional house is no more appropriate for today than a doctor who bleeds his patients. It is a ridiculous argument, and I have never met a modern architect so breathtakingly stupid that he or she cannot be assumed to recognize its weakness. And yet it is heard over and over again, still to this day.
Having read articles in Pencil Points by architecture critics defending traditional architecture in the years before modernism took over the architectural establishment, I realize that an entire field can become so besotted by its orthodoxy that it can no longer uphold its end of a discourse with those who seek to end the conversation by banning the idea – as the modernists eventually came very close to accomplishing, vis-a-vis traditional architecture, after they booted classicism from the establishment. Now the modernists are beset by the same lack of imagination in their response to new traditional architecture. And thus too in the realm of music.
So enjoy this essay by John Borstlap. He is tapping into the courage required, after all these years, to call out sheer stupidity in argumentation.
John Borstlap’s essay is excellent and, naturally, the parallels between music and architecture are many. John is also the composer of some very beautiful new music that gives the lie to the claim that only dissonant and chaotic expressions can be made today. Bravo!
LikeLike