‘Modernism and all that’

Here is Le Corbusier's Ronchamps, and beside it, Les Beaumettes, an informal settlement from about 1500 in Provence.

Here is Le Corbusier’s Ronchamps, and beside it, Les Beaumettes, an informal settlement from about 1500 in Provence.

Michael Mehaffy, the architectural theorist from Portland, Ore., who used to work with Prince Charles, sent in this brief essay to the TradArch list, which he has kindly let me post on my blog. There’s a lot of good stuff to chew on here, so, here it is:

We need to be clear what is good and bad about the work that falls under the “Modernist” rubric.  (Under which I include all the current “rococo” variants, as Eisenman aptly termed them.)

Good as in good craftsmanship, handsome proportioning, good intentions perhaps … and bad results, especially for urbanism and for human habitat overall.  The end result has been a few handsome buildings, amidst a colossal degradation of the human and natural environments, propelled by a design-marketing regime.  Indeed, in its outcome, the Modernist movement has a lot to answer for.

But let’s be more nuanced and less broad-brushed.  Otherwise we are less effective in our rebuttals. …

To put it bluntly:  “Modernism” is a shallow marketing package (and a weak theoretical outline) that does include, within the product package, some good craftsmanship and good design.  (And some not good – but they’re not alone.)  Let’s just stipulate that.  It does no harm, and is even beneficial.

At that point we can then go after the false theory of modernity that underlies the marketing narrative – and prohibits good traditional work, and causes all sorts of other degradations, poverties and other problems.

The false theory is that we live in a wholly different age, and we can toss out everything that came before.  But as Bruno Latour famously put it, “We have never been modern.”  The whole thing is a marketing scam.  (Students are especially receptive to that idea, by the way.)

The best rebuttal is from the Modernists themselves.  Take for example Picasso’s work appropriating African masks and other so-called “primitive” art, and re-branding it as the radical new work of a wholly exceptional human age.  Now that’s a brazen scam for you!

Of course Picasso also freely admitted that “good artists copy, and great artists steal.”  And by this measure, at least, he was great.  And in so doing, he fully rebutted the idea that nothing from the past can be used again, or that we are in a wholly new age with a wholly new aesthetic, etc.  Clearly the purest nonsense!  (But the idea that we can explore and develop new synthetic approaches within a liberal tradition* was valuable — he just didn’t describe it that way, because he was marketing an image of himself as a radical genius of a new age.  Commodification.)

Now take Le Corbusier.  Please!  We are in a great new epoch (emphasis his) and we need to see cities as wonderful mechanical toys with alluring art-design packaging.   That too worked wonderfully as a marketing and production exercise.  That too was a brazen scam – with the worst kinds of catastrophic results.

But we can freely admit that he, like Picasso, was a very talented craftsman-artist, who could do very handsome work.  (Which we might like or not, but we can grant the quality of craftsmanship all the same.)

And like Picasso, he was a brazen thief of history.  In so doing, he proved that copying the past is not to be prohibited.  We must draw the lesson that a new synthetic approach, including history, is the way forward in this “trans-modernist” age.  (Through to the other side, as it were.  As opposed to post-modernism, which tried a reactionary approach that failed – it only put a costume on the same old model, old wine in new skins, shall we say.)

Above are images of Le Corbusier’s Ronchamps, and beside it, Les Beaumettes, an informal settlement from about 1500 in Provence.  Le Corbusier knew this area very well and could not have been ignorant of these buildings.  Brazen thievery, conscious or otherwise.

* I mean this term in the classical sense of liberal arts, liberal economics, liberal enlightenment in culture, etc.  The DNA of the USA, and of our Greco-Dutch heritage.

Michael Mehaffy

About David Brussat

This blog was begun in 2009 as a feature of the Providence Journal, where I was on the editorial board and wrote a weekly column of architecture criticism for three decades. Architecture Here and There fights the style wars for classical architecture and against modern architecture, no holds barred. History Press asked me to write and in August 2017 published my first book, "Lost Providence." I am now writing my second book. My freelance writing on architecture and other topics addresses issues of design and culture locally and globally. I am a member of the board of the New England chapter of the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art, which bestowed an Arthur Ross Award on me in 2002. I work from Providence, R.I., where I live with my wife Victoria, my son Billy and our cat Gato. If you would like to employ my writing and editing to improve your work, please email me at my consultancy, dbrussat@gmail.com, or call 401.351.0457. Testimonial: "Your work is so wonderful - you now enter my mind and write what I would have written." - Nikos Salingaros, mathematician at the University of Texas, architectural theorist and author of many books.
This entry was posted in Architecture, Art and design and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to ‘Modernism and all that’

  1. Jota Guedes says:

    What are the concrete indications that Le Corbusier was being well acquainted with the region of Les Beaumettes? In doing his work, he developed a series of similar themes. The Building roof, for example, was an obsession for him from the twenties – just look at the book The Decorative Art of Today, with photos of airplane wings, which reverberate on the roof at Ronchamp. The curvatures are an idea of ​​him from Visual Acoustics – also an idea that he has been perfecting from a very young age.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Jota Guedes Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.